Philosophy is the childhood of the intellect, and a culture that tries to skip it will never grow up.
Thomas NagelRead
It is prima facie highly implausible that life as we know it is the result of a sequence of physical accidents together with the mechanism of natural selection. We are supposed to abandon this naïve response, not in favor of a fully worked out physical/chemical explanation but in favor of an alternative that is really a schema for explanation, supported by some examples. What is lacking, to my knowledge, is a credible argument that the story has a nonnegligible probability of being true.
Interpretation
The quote challenges the notion that life was formed purely by random accidents and natural selection, suggesting a need for a more credible explanation.
In this quote, Thomas Nagel critiques the widely accepted scientific view that life emerged through chance events and natural selection. He argues that this perspective is overly simplistic and lacks a compelling argument for its validity. Instead, he calls for an alternative schema that could offer a more profound understanding of life's origins, indicating that the current explanations do not account for the complexities of existence.
In practice
In a discussion about the origins of life during a philosophy class.
Philosophy is the childhood of the intellect, and a culture that tries to skip it will never grow up.
To look for a single general theory of how to decide the right thing to do is like looking for a single theory of how to decide what to believe.
There is a tendency to seek an objective account of everything before admitting its reality.
Altruism itself depends on a recognition of the reality of other persons, and on the equivalent capacity to regard oneself as merely one individual among many.
Once we see an aspect of what we or someone else does as something that happens, we lose our grip on the idea that it has been done and that we can judge the doer and not just the happening.
The external view [of agency] forces itself on us at the same time that we resist it. One way this occurs is through the gradual erosion of what we do by the subtraction of what happens.
There is no polite way to say that business is destroying the world.
The soul is the perceiver and revealer of truth. We know truth when we see it, let skeptic and scoffer say what they choose. Foolish people ask you, when you have spoken what they do not wish to hear, 'How do you know it is truth, and not an error of your own?' We know truth when we see it, from opinion, as we know when we are awake that we are awake.
An inner process stands in need of outward criteria.
I don't presume to have knowledge of what happens after I die. But I feel very strongly that whether the reward is in the here and now or in the hereafter, the aligning myself to my faith and my values is a good thing.
Mystery is the essence of divinity
"Between a high, solid wall and an egg that breaks against it, I will always stand on the side of the egg."_x000D_ _x000D_ Yes, no matter how right the wall may be and how wrong the egg, I will stand with the egg. Someone else will have to decide what is right and what is wrong; perhaps time or history will decide. If there were a novelist who, for whatever reason, wrote works standing with the wall, of what value would such works be?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.