Eating is always a decision, nobody forces your hand to pick up food and put it into your mouth.
As a result of my philosophy, I wasn't even upset about Hitler. I was willing to go to war to knock him off, but I didn't hate him. I hated what he was doing.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote expresses a philosophical stance on the distinction between personal feelings and actions against harmful behaviors.
Albert Ellis articulates a complex emotional response to Adolf Hitler, conveying that while he was prepared to take action against Hitler's aggressive actions during the war, he did not harbor personal hatred towards Hitler himself. This reflects a nuanced understanding that one can oppose destructive actions without succumbing to personal animosity, emphasizing the importance of focusing on the actions rather than the individual.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion on moral philosophy, one might quote Ellis to illustrate the importance of separating actions from personal feelings.
More from Albert Ellis
All quotes →Religious creeds encourage some of the craziest kinds of thoughts, emotions, and behaviors and favor severe manifestations of neurosis, borderline personality states, and sometimes even psychosis.
I had used eclectic therapy and behavior therapy on myself at the age of 19 to get over my fear of public speaking and of approaching young women in public.
If you would stop, really stop, damning yourself, others, and unkind conditions, you would find it almost impossible to upset yourself emotionally - about anything. Yes, anything.
The best years of your life are the ones in which you decide your problems are your own. You do not blame them on your mother, the ecology, or the president. You realize that you control your own destiny.
Attempts to help humans eliminate all self-ratings and views self-esteem as a self-defeating concept that encourages them to make conditional evaluations of self. Instead, it teaches people unconditional self-acceptance.
Similar quotes
At the beginning of human history, as we struggled to light fires and to chisel fallen trees into rudimentary canoes, who could have predicted that long after we had managed to send men to the moon and areoplanes to Australasia, we would still have such trouble knowing how to tolerate ourselves, forgive our loved ones, and apologise for our tantrums?
The opposite of manliness isn't cowardice; it's technology.
Coffee is a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your older self.
Our repugnance to death increases in proportion to our consciousness of having lived in vain.
There's enough food in this world. There's enough housing in this world. There's enough shelter in this world. There's enough clothing in this world. There's enough teachers, there's enough universities for everybody's needs to be met, and the reasons they aren't is not because of lack of resources. It's because of distribution, and that's the politics of hate, which is why this is a movement against that. It's a politics of love.
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. In that race which daily hastens us towards death, the body maintains its irreparable lead.