Eating is always a decision, nobody forces your hand to pick up food and put it into your mouth.
As a result of my philosophy, I wasn't even upset about Hitler. I was willing to go to war to knock him off, but I didn't hate him. I hated what he was doing.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote expresses a philosophical stance on the distinction between personal feelings and actions against harmful behaviors.
Albert Ellis articulates a complex emotional response to Adolf Hitler, conveying that while he was prepared to take action against Hitler's aggressive actions during the war, he did not harbor personal hatred towards Hitler himself. This reflects a nuanced understanding that one can oppose destructive actions without succumbing to personal animosity, emphasizing the importance of focusing on the actions rather than the individual.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion on moral philosophy, one might quote Ellis to illustrate the importance of separating actions from personal feelings.
More from Albert Ellis
All quotes →Religious creeds encourage some of the craziest kinds of thoughts, emotions, and behaviors and favor severe manifestations of neurosis, borderline personality states, and sometimes even psychosis.
I had used eclectic therapy and behavior therapy on myself at the age of 19 to get over my fear of public speaking and of approaching young women in public.
If you would stop, really stop, damning yourself, others, and unkind conditions, you would find it almost impossible to upset yourself emotionally - about anything. Yes, anything.
The best years of your life are the ones in which you decide your problems are your own. You do not blame them on your mother, the ecology, or the president. You realize that you control your own destiny.
Attempts to help humans eliminate all self-ratings and views self-esteem as a self-defeating concept that encourages them to make conditional evaluations of self. Instead, it teaches people unconditional self-acceptance.
Similar quotes
For the saddest epitaph which can be carved in memory of a vanished freedom is that it was lost because its possessors failed to stretch forth a saving hand while there was still time.
Every right is married to a duty, every freedom owes a corresponding responsibility.
As I know more of mankind I expect less of them, and am ready now to call a man a good man upon easier terms than I was formerly.
Now the standard cure for one who is sunk is to consider those in actual destitution or physical suffering—this is an all-weather beatitude for gloom in general and fairly salutary day-time advice for everyone. But at three o’clock in the morning, a forgotten package has the same tragic importance as a death sentence, and the cure doesn’t work—and in a real dark night of the soul it is always three o’clock in the morning, day after day.
In our rather stupid time, hunting is belittled and misunderstood, many refusing to see it for the vital vacation from the human condition that it is, or to acknowledge that the hunter does not hunt in order to kill; on the contrary, he kills in order to have hunted.
Novels can change attitudes. Maybe we should speak quietly otherwise politicians will use novels as propaganda.