There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
Noam ChomskyRead
States are not moral agents, people are, and can impose moral standards on powerful institutions.
Interpretation
This quote emphasizes that moral responsibility lies with individuals rather than governments or institutions.
Noam Chomsky's quote underscores the idea that while states and institutions hold power, it is ultimately individuals who possess the capacity for moral judgment. This suggests that it is the responsibility of people to impose ethical standards on these powerful entities, rather than blindly following their actions. It calls for accountability and reminds us that significant change begins with individual moral agency.
In practice
This quote could be referenced in a discussion about social justice and individual accountability.
There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
The Tao never does anything, yet through it all things are done. If powerful men and women could venter themselves in it, the whole world would be transformed by itself, in its natural rhythms. People would be content with their simple, everyday lives, in harmony, and free of desire. When there is no desire, all things are at peace.
Theology asserts propositions that cannot be proven true; ideologues hold stoutly to a worldview despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality. When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind. And there is the danger: voters and politicians alike, oblivious to the facts.
Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.
From my perspective, I absolutely believe in a greater spiritual power, far greater than I am, from which I have derived strength in moments of sadness or fear. That's what I believe, and it was very, very strong in the forest.
Going back to a simpler life based on living by sufficiency rather than excess is not a step backward.
How did her life live itself without her.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.