Nintendo's philosophy is never to go the easy path; it's always to challenge ourselves and try to do something new.
Shigeru MiyamotoRead
Anything that is impractical can be play. It's doing something other than what is necessary to continue living as an animal.
Interpretation
Impractical activities can serve as play and enrich our lives beyond mere survival.
This quote by Shigeru Miyamoto suggests that engaging in activities that may not have practical value can lead to joy and fulfillment. Play is portrayed as a vital aspect of human existence, distinguishing us from mere survival instinct as animals, and allowing creativity, exploration, and expression to flourish.
In practice
Using this quote in a speech about the importance of creativity in education.
Nintendo's philosophy is never to go the easy path; it's always to challenge ourselves and try to do something new.
There are big lines between those who play video games and those who do not. For those who don't, video games are irrelevant. They think all video games must be too difficult.
I think when you talk about competing against others, the problem is that you refer to something that's been done already and try to beat it.
Their attitude is, 'okay, I am the customer. You are supposed to entertain me.' It's kind of a passive attitude they're taking, and to me it's kind of a pathetic thing. They do not know how interesting it is if you move one step further and try to challenge yourself with more advanced games.
If we end up creating a gameplay structure where it makes sense for, whether it's a female to go rescue a male or a gay man to rescue a lesbian woman or a lesbian woman to rescue a gay man, we might take that approach.
I think Zelda 64 is utilizing about 90 percent of the N64 potential, ... When we made Mario 64 we were simply utilizing 60 to 70 percent. So we have come a long way I believe.
We fought a war on poverty, and poverty won
The world is full of ways and means to waste time.
When it comes to God's existence, I'm not an atheist and I'm not agnostic. I'm an acrostic. The whole thing puzzles me.
Abortion and racism are both symptoms of a fundamental human error. The error is thinking that when someone stands in the way of our wants, we can justify getting that person out of our lives. Abortion and racism stem from the same poisonous root, selfishness.
The policy of the emperors and the senate, as far as it concerned religion, was happily seconded by the reflections of the enlightened, and by the habits of the superstitious, part of their subjects. The various modes of worship, which prevailed in the Roman world, were all considered by the people, as equally true; by the philosopher, as equally false; and by the magistrate, as equally useful. And thus toleration produced not only mutual indulgence, but even religious concord.
Since survival is the sine qua non, I now define the "moral behavior" as "behavior that tends toward survival".
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.