Nintendo's philosophy is never to go the easy path; it's always to challenge ourselves and try to do something new.
Shigeru MiyamotoRead
There are big lines between those who play video games and those who do not. For those who don't, video games are irrelevant. They think all video games must be too difficult.
Interpretation
This quote highlights the divide between gamers and non-gamers, suggesting that non-gamers may misunderstand the appeal of video games.
Shigeru Miyamoto points out the significant cultural divide between individuals who engage in video gaming and those who do not. For those outside the gaming community, video games may seem daunting and irrelevant, as they often operate under the assumption that games are inherently difficult. This perspective leads to a lack of understanding and appreciation for the gaming world's depth and the enjoyment it provides to players.
In practice
Using this quote to introduce a discussion on gaming culture at a technology conference.
Nintendo's philosophy is never to go the easy path; it's always to challenge ourselves and try to do something new.
I think when you talk about competing against others, the problem is that you refer to something that's been done already and try to beat it.
Their attitude is, 'okay, I am the customer. You are supposed to entertain me.' It's kind of a passive attitude they're taking, and to me it's kind of a pathetic thing. They do not know how interesting it is if you move one step further and try to challenge yourself with more advanced games.
If we end up creating a gameplay structure where it makes sense for, whether it's a female to go rescue a male or a gay man to rescue a lesbian woman or a lesbian woman to rescue a gay man, we might take that approach.
I think Zelda 64 is utilizing about 90 percent of the N64 potential, ... When we made Mario 64 we were simply utilizing 60 to 70 percent. So we have come a long way I believe.
Our job as the game creators or developers - the programmers, artists, and whatnot - is that we have to kind of put ourselves in the user's shoes. We try to see what they're seeing, and then make it, and support what we think they might think.
I may be just an empty flesh terminal reliant on technology for all my ideas, memories and relationships, but I am confident that all of that everything that makes me a unique human being is still out there somewhere, safe in a theoretical storage space owned by giant, multinational corporations.
Today, the smartphone in your pocket has a high-quality digital camera. Everyone - not just artists - is a photographer, and the explosion of photos taken annually proves it.
The Internet may well disempower the nation state, but at the same time, it also strengthens certain specific state functions - like surveillance. As a political entity, it doesn't empower the nation sate. It creates the availability of much more data than the digestive system of the nation state could possibly assimilate.
The Internet is showing us what it thinks we want to see, but not necessarily what we need to see.
You have to immerse yourself into a product and use it in order to really understand it and that's why I have a new cellphone every month or two.
The marketplace judges technologies by their practical effectiveness, by whether they succeed or fail to do the job they are designed to do.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.