One of the questions that has most bothered me in my reflections on culture is the question of kitsch. Just what is it? When did it begin? And why?
Roger ScrutonRead
Modernist buildings exclude dialogue, and the void that they create around themselves is not a public space but a desertification
Interpretation
The quote critiques modernist architecture for isolating itself and failing to foster public interaction.
Roger Scruton argues that modernist buildings often create an atmosphere of exclusion, leading to spaces that do not invite dialogue or community engagement. Instead of becoming lively public areas where relationships can flourish, these structures contribute to a sense of emptiness and desolation, making the surroundings feel more like a desert than an accessible and welcoming environment.
In practice
In a discussion about urban planning, this quote can be used to emphasize the importance of creating inviting public spaces.
One of the questions that has most bothered me in my reflections on culture is the question of kitsch. Just what is it? When did it begin? And why?
There are big questions science doesn't answer, such as why is there something rather than nothing? There can't be a scientific answer to that because it's the answer that precedes science.
18th century opera is packed with emotion, but contains not a trace of kitsch. Only with the 'thees' and 'thous' of Victorian poetry does the disease begin to grow in our poetic tradition.
The robust English view used to be that the correct response to offensive words is to ignore them, or to answer them with a rebuke. If you invoke the law at all, it should be to protect the one who gives the offence, and not the one who takes it. Now, it seems, it is all the other way round.
For two centuries the English countryside has been an icon of national identity and the loved reminder of our island home. Yet the government is bent on littering the hills with wind turbines and the valleys with high speed railways.
You cannot own a symphony or a novel in the way you can own a Damien Hirst. As a result there are far fewer fake symphonies or fake novels than there are fake works of visual art.
A greater focus on design in all new homes would make the best use of land, create homes and public spaces, and reinforce the structures of urban life.
If you look at the Earth without architecture, its sometimes a little bit unpleasant. So there is this basic human need to do shelter in the broadest sense of the word, whether its a movie theater or a simple log cabin in the mountains. This is the core of architecture: To provide a space for human beings.
A profound design process eventually makes the patron, the architect, and every occasional visitor in the building a slightly better human being.
People can inhabit anything. And they can be miserable in anything and ecstatic in anything. More and more I think that architecture has nothing to do with it. Of course, that's both liberating and alarming.
It is difficult to design a space that will not attract people. What is remarkable is how often this has been accomplished.
Contemporary architects tend to impose modernity on something. There is a certain concern for history but itβs not very deep. I understand that time has changed, we have evolved. But I donβt want to forget the beginning. A lasting architecture has to have roots.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.